Does circumcision allow more growth of the penis?

In comparison to those non-circumcised, is it possible that those without circumcision does not have more potential of full growth because there is an overlap of skin covering the head of the penis?





Its an assumption because the skin is obstructing the penis, thus not allowing it to grow out.

Does circumcision allow more growth of the penis?
THE FIRST CIRCUMCISION WAS DONE BY ABRAHAM AS A BLOOD COVENANT WITH GOD. THE FORESKIN WAS CONSIDERED SOMETHING OF NO VALUE. IT IS OFTEN SAID THAT A PENIS WHICH HAS BEEN CIRCUMCISED IS LONGER. PEOPLE WHO HAVE THIS DONE DO NOT HAVE A PROBLEM WITH INFECTIONS AND CLEANLINESS THAT UNCIRCUMCISED MEN HAVE.
Reply:The skin is not an obstruction, it grows along with the penis.





Jackie S: I'm uncut, and in my 34 years i've never had an infection or a hygiene issue. The connection between hygiene and circumcision is false, it's just as easy to clean an uncut penis as the skin moves back.


Any uncut man who has had a penile hygiene issue was probably just an unclean kind of person anyway, and he would have been just as unclean even if he had been cut.
Reply:Sorry, I don't there's anything to that. The skin doesn't really block the penis's growth at all. It's just loose skin over the head of the penis.
Reply:No, there are two reasons for circumcision that I know. One is for religious beliefs (Jewish faith). Two is that it makes hygiene easier. It is harder to keep the penis clean with the extra skin there. It doesn't have to do with growth or size. If it did all men would choose to do it and all women would want them to do so.